<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grave robbery</title>
	<link>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/</link>
	<description>words &#38; music</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Technoclasm&lt;/em&gt; is an excellent coinage, though I fear that it might be misunderstood since these days &lt;em&gt;techno-&lt;/em&gt; in English has come to mean more or less exclusively "having to do with technology". Maybe we should insist on it nonetheless. 

Recently in Slate there was &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2181859" rel="nofollow"&gt;a story about Nabokov's last, unfinished novel&lt;/a&gt;, which he left instructions to have destroyed. Apparently Dmitri is dithering about whether or not to feed it to the "scholars". My view remains that of the above article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Technoclasm</em> is an excellent coinage, though I fear that it might be misunderstood since these days <em>techno-</em> in English has come to mean more or less exclusively &#8220;having to do with technology&#8221;. Maybe we should insist on it nonetheless. </p>
<p>Recently in Slate there was <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2181859" rel="nofollow">a story about Nabokov&#8217;s last, unfinished novel</a>, which he left instructions to have destroyed. Apparently Dmitri is dithering about whether or not to feed it to the &#8220;scholars&#8221;. My view remains that of the above article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>I've been trying to find any information about the tendency for artists to destroy their own work, but I couldn't come up with much except this.   The issue is well known, but rarely discussed and it's hard because this "condition" has no name. From Greek, it would be something like "technoclasm" - art-destruction.  I'd like to find psychological studies on this condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to find any information about the tendency for artists to destroy their own work, but I couldn&#8217;t come up with much except this.   The issue is well known, but rarely discussed and it&#8217;s hard because this &#8220;condition&#8221; has no name. From Greek, it would be something like &#8220;technoclasm&#8221; - art-destruction.  I&#8217;d like to find psychological studies on this condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Yes, possibly that is a mitigating difference... Thanks for the lovely example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, possibly that is a mitigating difference&#8230; Thanks for the lovely example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elberry</title>
		<link>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>elberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenpoole.net/articles/grave-robbery/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Also Vergil instructed that his unfinished (and probably unfinishable) Aeneid be burned; but of course Augustus countermanded this. There seems a difference between Augustus recognising (i suppose) the genius of Vergil's abruptly-stopped epic, and literary scavengers hauling notebooks out of the trash to make their careers in academia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Vergil instructed that his unfinished (and probably unfinishable) Aeneid be burned; but of course Augustus countermanded this. There seems a difference between Augustus recognising (i suppose) the genius of Vergil&#8217;s abruptly-stopped epic, and literary scavengers hauling notebooks out of the trash to make their careers in academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
